Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

Spinning up carbon on land

aswann2

Abigail Swann
Member
I'm using CESM2.1.5

I'm trying to spin up the land carbon cycle in an I-case (CLM only) to eventually use as an initial condition for land in a B-case in emissions-driven mode.

First I ran an F-case to save coupler history output.
Then I ran 300 years of an I-case with AD mode on, driven by coupler history output. Things looked fairly equilibrated, but I realize that I may not have reached equilibrium with AD mode turned on. (see plots below)

Next I ran a new I-case with AD mode off, using the land restart as finidat (i.e. initial condition for land from the AD mode on case).
The carbon does not look equilibrated after 150 years especially for soil carbon, but curiously is equilibrating in the opposite direction from the way it was going with AD mode on. (i.e. soil carbon was decreasing in AD mode on, increasing with AD mode off). (see plots below) I tried both a hybrid branch and a startup run, they seemed to have equivalent carbon behavior.


Some questions:
1. Since AD mode and non-AD mode are going in opposite directions does running more time in AD mode help solve this problem?

2. How long approximately do you typically have to run with AD mode off after AD mode was on?

2. Is there something else I'm missing about how to do this spin up?
Unknown-27.pngUnknown-25.png
 

oleson

Keith Oleson
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
300 years for AD sounds about right. I haven't thought much about the different trends in AD and pAD, but as shown below, it seems typical. Top plot is from a recent AD and bottom from a recent pAD. It does take a long time to reach the strict equilibrium criteria we use, see lower left plot, we use 3% disequilibrium as our threshold. In this case it looks like about 1200 years. The global TOTSOMC comes into equilibrium for pAD after about 400 years, but it takes a lot longer for the 3% disequilibrium to be reached, mostly due to the high latitudes.

ctsm51_ctsm52d004_ne30pg3t232_GSWP3V1_AExp1BsnoCDE_blk_A5BCD_1850AD_Spinup-0.pngctsm51_ctsm52d004_ne30pg3t232_GSWP3V1_AExp1BsnoCDE_blk_A5BCD_1850pAD_Spinup-0.png
 
Top