Hello!
I’m building CESM 2.1.3 in the following configuration
Compset is: 1850_CAM60_CLM50%BGC-CROP_CICE_POP2%ECO%ABIO-DIC_MOSART_CISM2%NOEVOLVE_WW3_BGC%BDRD
Grid is: a%1.9x2.5_l%1.9x2.5_oi%gx1v7_r%r05_g%gland4_w%ww3a_m%gx1v7
Components in compset are: ['cam', 'clm', 'cice', 'pop', 'mosart', 'cism', 'ww3', 'sesp', 'drv', 'dart']
I can successfully build and run the model without having it fail. I'm trying to gauge how concerning build warnings are. Most of are of the formats:
warning #6843: A dummy argument with an explicit INTENT(OUT) declaration is not given an explicit value.
warning #6178: The return value of this FUNCTION has not been defined.
However, within my CLM build log I see the following:
remark #8291: Recommended relationship between field width 'W' and the number of fractional digits 'D' in this edit descriptor is 'W>=D+7'.
write (iulog,"(a,e12.6,a,i6,a,i6)") "SNICAR ERROR: Energy conservation error of : ", energy_sum, &
Tracing this back to the original file (SnowSnicarMod.f90 (911) )
! Energy conservation check:
! Incident direct+diffuse radiation equals (absorbed+bulk_transmitted+bulk_reflected)
energy_sum = (mu_not*pi*flx_slrd_lcl(bnd_idx)) + flx_slri_lcl(bnd_idx) - (F_abs_sum + F_btm_net + F_sfc_pls)
if (abs(energy_sum) > 0.00001_r8) then
write (iulog,"(a,e12.6,a,i6,a,i6)") "SNICAR ERROR: Energy conservation error of : ", energy_sum, &
" at timestep: ", nstep, " at column: ", c_idx
call endrun(decomp_index=c_idx, clmlevel=namec, msg=errmsg(sourcefile, __LINE__))
endif
I'm unsure if I this is a warning that signals a larger issue, or if it is ignorable? (seems not good)
Thanks in advance for any insight!
Best,
Colleen
I’m building CESM 2.1.3 in the following configuration
Compset is: 1850_CAM60_CLM50%BGC-CROP_CICE_POP2%ECO%ABIO-DIC_MOSART_CISM2%NOEVOLVE_WW3_BGC%BDRD
Grid is: a%1.9x2.5_l%1.9x2.5_oi%gx1v7_r%r05_g%gland4_w%ww3a_m%gx1v7
Components in compset are: ['cam', 'clm', 'cice', 'pop', 'mosart', 'cism', 'ww3', 'sesp', 'drv', 'dart']
I can successfully build and run the model without having it fail. I'm trying to gauge how concerning build warnings are. Most of are of the formats:
warning #6843: A dummy argument with an explicit INTENT(OUT) declaration is not given an explicit value.
warning #6178: The return value of this FUNCTION has not been defined.
However, within my CLM build log I see the following:
remark #8291: Recommended relationship between field width 'W' and the number of fractional digits 'D' in this edit descriptor is 'W>=D+7'.
write (iulog,"(a,e12.6,a,i6,a,i6)") "SNICAR ERROR: Energy conservation error of : ", energy_sum, &
Tracing this back to the original file (SnowSnicarMod.f90 (911) )
! Energy conservation check:
! Incident direct+diffuse radiation equals (absorbed+bulk_transmitted+bulk_reflected)
energy_sum = (mu_not*pi*flx_slrd_lcl(bnd_idx)) + flx_slri_lcl(bnd_idx) - (F_abs_sum + F_btm_net + F_sfc_pls)
if (abs(energy_sum) > 0.00001_r8) then
write (iulog,"(a,e12.6,a,i6,a,i6)") "SNICAR ERROR: Energy conservation error of : ", energy_sum, &
" at timestep: ", nstep, " at column: ", c_idx
call endrun(decomp_index=c_idx, clmlevel=namec, msg=errmsg(sourcefile, __LINE__))
endif
I'm unsure if I this is a warning that signals a larger issue, or if it is ignorable? (seems not good)
Thanks in advance for any insight!
Best,
Colleen