Dear All,
I have a question regarding the NBP variable.
I would like to compare the NBP variable with the calculated NBP.
The commonly known equation is 'NBP = NPP - HR - Fire'.
However, when calculating NBP with each variable (NPP - HR - COL_FIRE_CLOSS), it differs from the actual NBP variable.
The definitions for the variables are as follows:
NBP : net biome production includes fire landuse harvest and hrv_xsmrpool flux (latter smoothed over the year)
NPP : net primary production
HR : total heterotrophic respiration
COL_FIRE_CLOSS : total column-level fire C loss for non-peat fires outside land-type converted region
Accordingly, it seems that other variables (e.g. land use, harvest, and hrv_xsmrpool flux) are not included in this calculation.
Therefore, which variables should additionally be taken into account? (For example, WOOD_HARVESTC: wood harvest carbon (to product pools)).
Thanks!
I have a question regarding the NBP variable.
I would like to compare the NBP variable with the calculated NBP.
The commonly known equation is 'NBP = NPP - HR - Fire'.
However, when calculating NBP with each variable (NPP - HR - COL_FIRE_CLOSS), it differs from the actual NBP variable.
The definitions for the variables are as follows:
NBP : net biome production includes fire landuse harvest and hrv_xsmrpool flux (latter smoothed over the year)
NPP : net primary production
HR : total heterotrophic respiration
COL_FIRE_CLOSS : total column-level fire C loss for non-peat fires outside land-type converted region
Accordingly, it seems that other variables (e.g. land use, harvest, and hrv_xsmrpool flux) are not included in this calculation.
Therefore, which variables should additionally be taken into account? (For example, WOOD_HARVESTC: wood harvest carbon (to product pools)).
Thanks!