Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

Correctness of output datasets

jmccaa

New Member
If you are running the standard model, you should get a climate that looks like the control simulation. Climatology files for the control simulations can be found here:
http://www.ccsm.ucar.edu/models/atm-cam/sims/cam3.0/

To produce comparable climatological files from your own simulation, you'll need to run Mark Stevens analysis package. You can learn more about that here:
http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cms/mstevens/diagnostics/

Please note that you will not get exactly the same results due to differences among hardware and compiler versions.
 

eaton

CSEG and Liaisons
Doing a full climate simulation to compare against the controls is
ultimately necessary. But a good strategy for port validation includes
running a perturbation growth test first, as this test requires minimal
computational expense, and will reliably indicate when there is a problem
with the port which needs to be fixed before running a considerably more
expensive climate simulation. The procedure for doing perturbation growth
tests has been documented at

http://www.ccsm.ucar.edu/models/atm-cam/port/
 
Top