ag4680@nyu_edu
New Member
Hi,
Following the helpful guidance from Isla and Peter on running the Polvani Kushner Stratosphere and Topography respectively in NCAR dynamical cores, I was able to integrate the f19 and ne16np4 grids with 40 levels in the vertical.
Now I am aiming to increase the vertical resolution to 80 levels. However, when I do so, I get an error the goes like :
Error : GET_PBUF1D_FIELD_BY_INDEX : index (-1) out of range
This has something to do with the physics buffers and is generated in the src/physics/cam/physics_buffer.F90.in file. The 'index' variable associated with the buffer is -1 and is creating this error. My first guess is that this could be due to some issue related to undefined parameters for 80 levels in the namelist_defaults.xml file, but ofc I can be wrong.
I tried running the models with increased resolution in the horizontal but with same vertical levels (i.e ne30np4 and f09) and they run fine without generating this error. Hence this had got to do with the number of vertical levels I am using. Any help on the matter is deeply appreciated.
Regards,
Aman
Following the helpful guidance from Isla and Peter on running the Polvani Kushner Stratosphere and Topography respectively in NCAR dynamical cores, I was able to integrate the f19 and ne16np4 grids with 40 levels in the vertical.
Now I am aiming to increase the vertical resolution to 80 levels. However, when I do so, I get an error the goes like :
Error : GET_PBUF1D_FIELD_BY_INDEX : index (-1) out of range
This has something to do with the physics buffers and is generated in the src/physics/cam/physics_buffer.F90.in file. The 'index' variable associated with the buffer is -1 and is creating this error. My first guess is that this could be due to some issue related to undefined parameters for 80 levels in the namelist_defaults.xml file, but ofc I can be wrong.
I tried running the models with increased resolution in the horizontal but with same vertical levels (i.e ne30np4 and f09) and they run fine without generating this error. Hence this had got to do with the number of vertical levels I am using. Any help on the matter is deeply appreciated.
Regards,
Aman