Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

How does CICE work in standalone CAM 5.3 run

Hi,When I am running standalone CAM 5.3 along with CAM history files the model is producing CICE history files too. In the CICE component history files there is "grid cell mean ice thickness" variable. In the previous version (for example : CAM 3) the thickness used to be constant. In this standalone version of CAM 5.3 how can the model calculate sea ice thickness unless it is fully coupled with CICE model?

Does this model calculated thickenss affects the monthly prescribed sea ice forcings at each grid point?

Thanks,

Soumik
 

dbailey

CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
The sea ice thickness is still constant, but since the concentration (fraction) evolves from the data read in then the quanitity "hi" on the CICE history files is actually:hi = aice * mean thicknessThe label is confusing I agree. In the ice community we refer to this as volume because you simply multply hi by the cross-sectional gridcell area to get the real volume. If you look at hi/aice you will see that this is constant. Everything else about the ice state like snow depth, ice surface temperature, etc is prognostic.Dave
 

dbailey

CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
The sea ice thickness is still constant, but since the concentration (fraction) evolves from the data read in then the quanitity "hi" on the CICE history files is actually:hi = aice * mean thicknessThe label is confusing I agree. In the ice community we refer to this as volume because you simply multply hi by the cross-sectional gridcell area to get the real volume. If you look at hi/aice you will see that this is constant. Everything else about the ice state like snow depth, ice surface temperature, etc is prognostic.Dave
 
Top