Dear all,
When I output Z0MG, Z0HG, Z0MV, Z0HV, I found that Z0MG=Z0HG and Z0MV=Z0HV. Obviously this is not correct. For the underlying surface without vegetation cover, there is a corresponding mathematical formula between Z0MG and Z0HG. However, The output of CLM5 shows that the two are equal. What is the situation?In addition, when I set the corresponding vegetation coverage ratio in the PFT (as shown in the figure, crop etc. are set to 0), does the model use Z0MV and Z0HV to calculate the corresponding flux?
When I output Z0MG, Z0HG, Z0MV, Z0HV, I found that Z0MG=Z0HG and Z0MV=Z0HV. Obviously this is not correct. For the underlying surface without vegetation cover, there is a corresponding mathematical formula between Z0MG and Z0HG. However, The output of CLM5 shows that the two are equal. What is the situation?In addition, when I set the corresponding vegetation coverage ratio in the PFT (as shown in the figure, crop etc. are set to 0), does the model use Z0MV and Z0HV to calculate the corresponding flux?