climatemodelling@gmx_com
Member
Dear Forum Members,
I am trying to build CESM using Intel compilers, openmpi and netcdf 3.6 (build with Intel compiler) on our 64bit linux cluster (nodes with 48 processors each).
However during the compiling process I run into issues with the pio module. I do not intend to use parallel input/output and hence opted for the netcdf 3 version.
Is it still necessary to build the pio module? If not, how do I switch this option off?
It seems the compiler gets the correct options:
However, I still run into a lot of pointer issues with the pio module, e.g. a short example from the error messages:
Further, I wanted to ask experienced users which processor layouts are reasonable configurations for stand-alone CAM4 runs on either 2 degree or 1 degree horizontal resolution?
I am able to use a maximum of 48 processors (1 node) per run.
Thank you very much in advance!
I am trying to build CESM using Intel compilers, openmpi and netcdf 3.6 (build with Intel compiler) on our 64bit linux cluster (nodes with 48 processors each).
However during the compiling process I run into issues with the pio module. I do not intend to use parallel input/output and hence opted for the netcdf 3 version.
Is it still necessary to build the pio module? If not, how do I switch this option off?
It seems the compiler gets the correct options:
Code:
Machine=x86_64
OS=Linux
using NETCDF_PATH from environment
configure: WARNING: PNETCDF_PATH not found in environment, defaulting to /usr/local/pnetcdf
configure: WARNING: pnetcdf.inc not found in PNETCDF_PATH/include disabling pnetcdf support
configure: WARNING: libpnetcdf.a not found in PNETCDF_PATH/lib disabling pnetcdf support
checking Fortran 90 support for sizeof()... yes
However, I still run into a lot of pointer issues with the pio module, e.g. a short example from the error messages:
Code:
pio_msg_callbacks.F90(13): error #6457: This derived type name has not been declared. [FILE_DESC_T]
type(file_desc_t), pointer :: file
-------^
pio_msg_callbacks.F90(22): error #6404: This name does not have a type, and must have an explicit type. [FILE]
file=> lookupfile(fh)
--^
pio_msg_callbacks.F90(22): error #6795: The target must be of the same type and kind type parameters as the pointer. [FILE]
file=> lookupfile(fh)
--^
pio_msg_callbacks.F90(28): error #6285: There is no matching specific subroutine for this generic subroutine call. [PIO_CLOSEFILE]
call pio_closefile(file)
----------^
pio_msg_callbacks.F90(33): error #6284: There is no matching specific function for this generic function reference. [PIO_DEF_VAR]
ierr = pio_def_var(file, name, type, dimids, vardesc)
------------^
pio_msg_callbacks.F90(39): error #6284: There is no matching specific function for this generic function reference. [PIO_INQ_VARNDIMS]
ierr = pio_inq_varndims(file, id, len)
------------^
pio_msg_callbacks.F90(41): error #6284: There is no matching specific function for this generic function reference. [PIO_INQ_VARNATTS]
ierr = pio_inq_varnatts(file, id, len)
------------^
Further, I wanted to ask experienced users which processor layouts are reasonable configurations for stand-alone CAM4 runs on either 2 degree or 1 degree horizontal resolution?
I am able to use a maximum of 48 processors (1 node) per run.
Thank you very much in advance!