Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

output variables from FUN model

Status
Not open for further replies.

jinmuluo

Jinmu Luo
Member
Hi,

I outputted three variables to check plant absorption of inorganic N, "SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NH4", "SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3" and "SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN". I guess the "SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN" is the summary of the former two variables, right? But when I calculate the summation of "SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NH4", "SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3" above the "levdcmp" level, it looks like the result is much bigger than the "SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN". Any hints on this problem, or which variable I should use? Or does the soil layer matters?

Thank you

Jinmu
 

wwieder

Will Wieder
Member
I don't know if I completely understand your question @jinmuluo? considering the soil layers matter when calculating vertically resolved fluxes, which I think is what you're doing with these variables ending in _vr

I also think that N fixation isn't included in the NH4 and NO3 fluxes to plant, but they are included in SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN

See this line of code

And also this one
 

jinmuluo

Jinmu Luo
Member
I don't know if I completely understand your question @jinmuluo? considering the soil layers matter when calculating vertically resolved fluxes, which I think is what you're doing with these variables ending in _vr

I also think that N fixation isn't included in the NH4 and NO3 fluxes to plant, but they are included in SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN

See this line of code

And also this one
Thank you so much for your replies!

Do you mean SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN should always be larger than the summation of SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NH4 and SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3 considering fixation is included in SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN?

I thought SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN = SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NH4.sum(level='levdcmp') + SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3.sum(level='levdcmp')
hold in all output levels.

In my case, I saw the SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN was much smaller than the SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NH4.sum(level='levdcmp') + SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3.sum(level='levdcmp') .
 

wwieder

Will Wieder
Member
Yes, looking at the equations I linked in my reply the SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN will be larger than the NO3 and NH4 components.

Pay careful attention to the units in SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3, I'm assuming they are gN/m3? If so, you have to multipy this by soil layer thickness, (which changes with depth) before summing the fluxes to get gN/m2 (which I'm assuming are units for SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN)
 

jinmuluo

Jinmu Luo
Member
Yes, looking at the equations I linked in my reply the SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN will be larger than the NO3 and NH4 components.

Pay careful attention to the units in SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3, I'm assuming they are gN/m3? If so, you have to multipy this by soil layer thickness, (which changes with depth) before summing the fluxes to get gN/m2 (which I'm assuming are units for SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN)

I had checked the units before I did the calculation, from the output and the CNVegNitrogenFluxType.F90, SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3 has the unit of gN/m2/s.

float SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3(time, levdcmp, lndgrid) ;


SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3:long_name = "plant uptake of NO3, FUN" ;


SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3:units = "gN/m^2/s" ;


SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3:cell_methods = "time: mean" ;


SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3:_FillValue = 1.e+36f ;


SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3:missing_value = 1.e+36f ;


SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3:landunit_mask = "unknown" ;


but look at this line of code

it looks like SMINN_TO_PLANT_FUN_NO3 should have the unit of gN/m3/s
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top