Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

PORT output missing PS?

Not sure if it's meant to be like this or not ...The h1 file that PORThttps://wiki.ucar.edu/display/port/PORTcreates automatically does not have PS (surface pressure) but it has all the hybrid pressure coefficients.I suspected that PS was forgotten. 
 

eaton

CSEG and Liaisons
It appears that the file does contain the midpoint pressures (rad_pmid) as well as wet and dry pressure differences for each layer (rad_pdel, rad_pdeldry).  Since the PS field is not included I can only assume that PORT doesn't need it. 
 
Thanks for the comment, Brian.Another question:Imagine I want to check the radiative forcing for changing concentration of SO4 to a half: [SO4]->[SO4]/2.Do I have to prepare a forcing files for that have ALL rad_[] variables or just rad_SO4/2. from the original output?The model seems not to like the latter. It stops without commenting. I am asking because the latter is much lighter in terms of data storage. 
 

eaton

CSEG and Liaisons
I believe that PORT is implemented with a single input stream which would imply that all the variables produced for the offline driver need to be present in the files uses as input.  I agree it would be nice to allow a second input stream which could be used to modify fields from the original output.  I'll keep that in mind.  Thanks for mentioning it.
 
Top