duderstadtk@gmail_com
New Member
We are looking at stratosphere-troposphere exchange (STE) in our WACCM runs. Is there a way include potential vorticity (Ertel's Potential Vorticity) in our history files?
There appears to be a subroutine in the cam dynamics code "epvd.F90" that calculates "absolute potential vorticity (epv)". However, there doesn't seem to be a variable for potential vorticity in the Master Field List. I also can't find the location from which "epvd" is called. Can we use the "epvd" subroutine to calculate and record potential vorticity in order to study strat-trop exchange? How would we go about calling this subroutine and then adding "epv" as a field to the Master Field List for the history files?
Alternative approaches from the literature for identifying tropopause and strat-trop exchange include:
Lapse rate decrease to 2 K/km
Ertel's Potential Vorticity
O3-CO correlations
Water vapor distributions
Artificial tracers (e.g., Prather et al., 2012 -- "e90" tracer)
Ratio of cosmogenic radionuclides Beryllium-10 to Beryllium-7
Do you have any suggestions on which of these methods is the best approach for identifying STE on the basis of WACCM's current and future capabilities? [Are there plans to include cosmic rays and radionuclides like Be-7 in future releases of WACCM?]
Thanks!
There appears to be a subroutine in the cam dynamics code "epvd.F90" that calculates "absolute potential vorticity (epv)". However, there doesn't seem to be a variable for potential vorticity in the Master Field List. I also can't find the location from which "epvd" is called. Can we use the "epvd" subroutine to calculate and record potential vorticity in order to study strat-trop exchange? How would we go about calling this subroutine and then adding "epv" as a field to the Master Field List for the history files?
Alternative approaches from the literature for identifying tropopause and strat-trop exchange include:
Lapse rate decrease to 2 K/km
Ertel's Potential Vorticity
O3-CO correlations
Water vapor distributions
Artificial tracers (e.g., Prather et al., 2012 -- "e90" tracer)
Ratio of cosmogenic radionuclides Beryllium-10 to Beryllium-7
Do you have any suggestions on which of these methods is the best approach for identifying STE on the basis of WACCM's current and future capabilities? [Are there plans to include cosmic rays and radionuclides like Be-7 in future releases of WACCM?]
Thanks!