jbh@tsinghua_edu_cn
New Member
Hi, everybody, I am a newcomer for CAM5 simulation. Now, I face many problems/questions with CAM5 running.
Firstly, I know Hurrell et al.(2008) data is usually used for AMIP style uncoupled simulations. I checked this data and found SST and SIC are distributed globally, that means there are values of SST and SIC over continents, which also evolve with time. The first question is that why there are values of SST and SIC over continents and are they necessary and used in CAM5 simulation? If not, why they evolve with time? Are there some rules for the SST/SCI values over land?
Secondly, I compared the Hurrell et al.(2008) dataset with the observations from Hadley Centre. Some differences exist in sea ice variation between these two datasets. So, which one is better? And, if I want to use the observed SST/SIC of Hadley Centre to force CAM5, how can I prepare the boundary data? Can the boundary data be done by replacing the SST/SCI of ocean in Hurrell et al. (2008) dataset with the counterpart in Hadley dataset ?
Thirdly, I read many papers about simulations forced by sea ice, which based on Hurrell et al.(2008) data. If I do some modification to the SIC over ocean, must I do similar modifications to the SIC over land? For example, I made a sea ice boundary condition by detrending the SIC over ocean, should I do similar process to the SIC over land?
Very appreciated for any suggestions and advices!
Firstly, I know Hurrell et al.(2008) data is usually used for AMIP style uncoupled simulations. I checked this data and found SST and SIC are distributed globally, that means there are values of SST and SIC over continents, which also evolve with time. The first question is that why there are values of SST and SIC over continents and are they necessary and used in CAM5 simulation? If not, why they evolve with time? Are there some rules for the SST/SCI values over land?
Secondly, I compared the Hurrell et al.(2008) dataset with the observations from Hadley Centre. Some differences exist in sea ice variation between these two datasets. So, which one is better? And, if I want to use the observed SST/SIC of Hadley Centre to force CAM5, how can I prepare the boundary data? Can the boundary data be done by replacing the SST/SCI of ocean in Hurrell et al. (2008) dataset with the counterpart in Hadley dataset ?
Thirdly, I read many papers about simulations forced by sea ice, which based on Hurrell et al.(2008) data. If I do some modification to the SIC over ocean, must I do similar modifications to the SIC over land? For example, I made a sea ice boundary condition by detrending the SIC over ocean, should I do similar process to the SIC over land?
Very appreciated for any suggestions and advices!