matthes@gfz-potsdam_de
New Member
I am experiencing a similar problem with a segmentation fault as discussed in the previous thread. I am running waccm_16_cam3_5_48 in CCMVal REFB1 configuration on an IBM Power6 System at the DKRZ in Hamburg on one node.
The model ran without problems for 5 years and suddenly stops on January 15th with a numerical instability. To get the model over this point I would like to try to reduce the timestep. Therefore I have set dtime to 900 instead of 1800 in the "use-case" namelist.
Apparently the model does not like the change in timestep as it is different from the model timestep of the last restart files and is producing the following message:
0: Successfully initialized the land model
0: begin continuation run at:
0: nstep= 105121 year= 1964 month= 1 day= 1 seconds= 1800
0:
0:************************************************************
0:
3: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
3: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
6: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
6: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
0: dtime_sync= 900 dtime_clm= 1800 mod = 900
0: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
0: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
4: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
4: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
5: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
5: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
7: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
7: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
2: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
2: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
7:
7: Traceback:
7: Offset 0x00000010 in procedure xl__trbk_
I was trying to make a branch run instead of a continuation run but I cannot find the right place to overwrite the namelist.
I included the following line in the use-case namelist for my specific run:
branch
but the start_type in drv_in is still "continue" instead of "branch".
Could somebody please help?
1. how to do a branch run for waccm16_cam3_5_48?
2. how to reduce the timestep for the fv WACCM version?
I only want to reduce the timestep for one month or so and increase it afterwards again, hoping that the instability problem will not happen so quickly again.....
The model ran without problems for 5 years and suddenly stops on January 15th with a numerical instability. To get the model over this point I would like to try to reduce the timestep. Therefore I have set dtime to 900 instead of 1800 in the "use-case" namelist.
Apparently the model does not like the change in timestep as it is different from the model timestep of the last restart files and is producing the following message:
0: Successfully initialized the land model
0: begin continuation run at:
0: nstep= 105121 year= 1964 month= 1 day= 1 seconds= 1800
0:
0:************************************************************
0:
3: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
3: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
6: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
6: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
0: dtime_sync= 900 dtime_clm= 1800 mod = 900
0: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
0: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
4: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
4: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
5: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
5: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
7: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
7: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
2: clm dtime 1800 and Eclock dtime 900 never align
2: ENDRUN:lnd_init_mct ERROR: time out of sync
7:
7: Traceback:
7: Offset 0x00000010 in procedure xl__trbk_
I was trying to make a branch run instead of a continuation run but I cannot find the right place to overwrite the namelist.
I included the following line in the use-case namelist for my specific run:
branch
but the start_type in drv_in is still "continue" instead of "branch".
Could somebody please help?
1. how to do a branch run for waccm16_cam3_5_48?
2. how to reduce the timestep for the fv WACCM version?
I only want to reduce the timestep for one month or so and increase it afterwards again, hoping that the instability problem will not happen so quickly again.....