wporter@mit_edu
New Member
Hello,
I have CCSM4 up and running on our cluster, and am working on validating the port. Stability and perturbation tests have all passed fine, but long-term runs are showing some significant differences with the CAM control data at ESG.
I started my 30-year run using the B_1850 compset at f19_g16 resolution, and compared the results to the data at the link above using AMWG, but my averaged annual temperatures differed from the control set by up to 3.2 degrees:
Should I be using different starting parameters for this comparison, or should I be looking at other problems with the port?
Thanks!
Will Porter
Portland State University
I have CCSM4 up and running on our cluster, and am working on validating the port. Stability and perturbation tests have all passed fine, but long-term runs are showing some significant differences with the CAM control data at ESG.
I started my 30-year run using the B_1850 compset at f19_g16 resolution, and compared the results to the data at the link above using AMWG, but my averaged annual temperatures differed from the control set by up to 3.2 degrees:
Should I be using different starting parameters for this comparison, or should I be looking at other problems with the port?
Thanks!
Will Porter
Portland State University