Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

soil4c_vr

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chr

Christian Dold
New Member
Dear CLM Modellers,

I am currently performing a spinup for my domain (with an I2000BGCCROP compset) on CLM5, and wanted to verify the simulated soilC values from the restart file with measured data. I noted that there are three soilC variables: soil1c_vr, soil2c_vr, and soil3c_vr in 25 soil layers. I suppose that the numbers refer to the SOM pools described in Chapter 21 of the CLM5 Tech Note. I wonder, if there is also a soil4c_vr available. It is mentioned in the Tech Note, and I found it in the old variable list for CLM4.5, but couldnt find it in the current restart file.

If there is no soil4c_vr available, can I assume that the sum of soil1c_vr, soil2c_vr, and soil3c_vr for each layer is equal to total soilc_vr?

Thanks for your help.
 

oleson

Keith Oleson
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
There are two options for the decomposition submodel, the CLM-CN pool structure which is the default in CLM4.5 and has four soil carbon pools, or a second pool structure based on the Century model which is the default in CLM5 and has three soil carbon pools. In theory, one could use the CLM-CN pool structure in CLM5 by specifying the namelist variable use_century_decomp = .false. In practice, I'm not sure this has been tested.
So default CLM5 has three soil carbon pools. soil4c_vr would only be present if use_century_decomp = .false. (CLM4.5).
The sum of soil1c_vr, soil2c_vr, and soil3c_vr should be soilc_vr.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top