Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

Start date errors?

I was wondering if anyone has encountered start date errors in the ipcc4 projections, specifically for the sresb1 and sresa2 scenarios. For example, in the output file:

pcmdi.ipcc4.ncar_ccsm3_0.sresb1.run8.daily.tas_A2.SRESB1_8.CCSM.atmd.2080-01-01_cat_2099-12-31.nc

the start date indicated in the time_bnds field is 2079-08-13.

However, when I look at the tas time-series from a grid-cell in northern North Dakota, the first value listed is -1.09 (converted from degrees K to degrees C), obviously a cold summer's day, even for N.D. Subsequent values are below zero, suggesting that the actual start date is closer to the first of the year.

I don't find similar problems for the sresa1b scenario. Any thoughts out there?
 

strandwg

Moderator
Staff member
Chris Wright said:
I was wondering if anyone has encountered start date errors in the ipcc4 projections, specifically for the sresb1 and sresa2 scenarios. For example, in the output file:

pcmdi.ipcc4.ncar_ccsm3_0.sresb1.run8.daily.tas_A2.SRESB1_8.CCSM.atmd.2080-01-01_cat_2099-12-31.nc

the start date indicated in the time_bnds field is 2079-08-13.

However, when I look at the tas time-series from a grid-cell in northern North Dakota, the first value listed is -1.09 (converted from degrees K to degrees C), obviously a cold summer's day, even for N.D. Subsequent values are below zero, suggesting that the actual start date is closer to the first of the year.

I don't find similar problems for the sresa1b scenario. Any thoughts out there?

Make sure you're taking into account the fixed 365-day year that's used in CCSM. The time value for the first time sample in that file is 759200.5, which gives a date of 1 Jan 2080 (759200.5/365 = 2080 years, 1/2 day). That makes sense with the values for 'tas' that you have observed.
 
Dear all,

I am a researcher, now I am working for Vietnam Institute Meteorology, Hydrology and Environment. I downloaded the result of CCSM (CCSM run b30.40a – CCSM3 SRES A1B) as a reference to estimate sea level rise in South China Sea . I did it following these steps:

1. I downloaded data for 100 years, each year only 4 month (1, 4, 7, 10) then I have the average value of sea suface high for each year at a cell.

2. I useded ncdump to change data form .nc to .txt

For instance: ncdump b30.040.pop.h.2000-01.nc –v SSH > b30.040.pop.h.2000-01.txt

3. I useded FORTRAN language to get the data at any cell that I want

4. finally, I have the chart from these data

It is very surprised me because of the trend of sea level not as I thinked, instead of rise up, it go down. I have checked all steps a lot of times to find the anwser but it seems to be a difficult problem for me. Can anyone check or explain why it is and how to get the correct data.
Thank you very much
 
Top