Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

WACCM O2 photolysis parameterization scheme

Hello everyone,I am working with WACCM, using CESM 1.2.2.From the following tech-notehttp://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/cesm1.2/cam/docs/description/cam5_technote.pdf (lines 3680-3682), I see that in WACCM the parameterizations used for the photolysis of O2 in the Schumann-Runge band is based on Koppers and Murtagh [1996].I have also seen that there is a switch ('xactive_prates') which allows to change between an interactive method (Kockarts [1996]) and a look-up table method (Koppers and Murtagh [1996]) to calculate the photolysis reaction rates. It is interesting to see that for WACCM this switch is always FALSE (the source code mo_photo.F90 lines 196-198).My question is then: why is it that way? in other terms, why does WACCM always use the Koppers and Murtagh scheme?RegardsDaniele Minganti
 
Top