Bad ice in OM

Amber

Amber
New Member
WARNING from PE 803: MOM_diabatic_aux.F90, applyBoundaryFluxesInOut(): Mass created. x,y,dh= -2.784E+02 7.218E+01 -7.968E-02


WARNING from PE 802: Bad ice data End set_ice_surface_state ; at -282.5 72.2 or i,j,k = 15 14 0; nbad = 4 on pe 802 ; T_sfc = 2.6595E+02, ps = 5.4419E-02, S_sfc = 1.3273E+02


WARNING from PE 862: Bad ice data End set_ice_surface_state ; at 54.4 68.3 or i,j,k = 8 12 0; nbad = 1 on pe 862 ; T_sfc = 2.6764E+02, ps = 6.8278E-03, S_sfc = 1.0216E+02


WARNING from PE 803: Bad ice data End set_ice_surface_state ; at -278.4 72.2 or i,j,k = 5 10 0; nbad = 5 on pe 803 ; T_sfc = 5.3720E+02, ps = 1.0000E+00, S_sfc = 2.1375E+05


FATAL from PE 803: lookup_es: saturation vapor pressure table overflow, nbad= 1


How could I handle these questions in OM?

Thanks for helping!
 

MattHarrison

Matthew Harrison
New Member
The first "mass created" warning is indicating a CFL issue near 278W,72N . The model has become unstable and has grounded with sea surface height below bathymetry. This can occur for multiple reasons and it is difficult to know without additional information about your experiment.

subsequent error messages indicate more widespread violations with unrealistic surface temperatures and salinity.

An easy test would be to see if reducing the baroclinic timestep (DT) alleviates this issue.
 
Vote Upvote 0 Downvote

Amber

Amber
New Member
The first "mass created" warning is indicating a CFL issue near 278W,72N . The model has become unstable and has grounded with sea surface height below bathymetry. This can occur for multiple reasons and it is difficult to know without additional information about your experiment.

subsequent error messages indicate more widespread violations with unrealistic surface temperatures and salinity.

An easy test would be to see if reducing the baroclinic timestep (DT) alleviates this issue.
Thank you for your reply. I tried modifying the topography files in the ocean and sea ice configuration to keep them consistent, to see if the model can run properly. The issue occurred when I was running the CORE repeated annual forcing for 300 years. I will try your method to see if it helps. Thank you again for your reply.
 
Vote Upvote 0 Downvote
Back
Top