Dear All,
I was following the CESM spin up turtorial here 1.5.4. Spinning up the Satellite Phenology Model — ctsm release-clm5.0 documentation . I find the definition of the steady state of Statellite-Phenology model is to run 50 simulation years.
While I am curious about any indicators about a SP case , comparing to the script SpinupStability_v10.ncl ,which applys the indicators and thrshold as follows:
GPP, TOTVEGC, TOTSOMC, TOTECOSYSC, TLAI ：0.02（PgC/yr or m²/m²/yr）
TWS：0.001（ m/yr）
H2OSNO：1.0（ mm/yr）
glob_thresh_area: 3.0
Then I was trying to utilize the radiation flux to be kind of indicator of the steady state of a Spined up case :
By modify the script I gain some similar output.
Is my modification valid? Or are there better indicators for a SP-driven DATM compset?
I was following the CESM spin up turtorial here 1.5.4. Spinning up the Satellite Phenology Model — ctsm release-clm5.0 documentation . I find the definition of the steady state of Statellite-Phenology model is to run 50 simulation years.
While I am curious about any indicators about a SP case , comparing to the script SpinupStability_v10.ncl ,which applys the indicators and thrshold as follows:
GPP, TOTVEGC, TOTSOMC, TOTECOSYSC, TLAI ：0.02（PgC/yr or m²/m²/yr）
TWS：0.001（ m/yr）
H2OSNO：1.0（ mm/yr）
glob_thresh_area: 3.0
Then I was trying to utilize the radiation flux to be kind of indicator of the steady state of a Spined up case :
| Variable | Threshold（W/m²） | Reference |
| FIRE | ±5 | Li et al. (2019) |
| FIRA | ±5 | Li et al. (2019) |
| FSH | ±5 | Shell et al. (2005) |
| EFLX_LH_TOT | ±10 | Winter and Eltahir (2010) |
Is my modification valid? Or are there better indicators for a SP-driven DATM compset?