Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

./case.submit error in porting cesm2.0.1 on Derecho

wangly

Linying Wang
New Member
Hi,

I am attempting to port CESM2.0.1 to Derecho. I have added the Derecho settings to the 'config_batch.xml', 'config_compilers.xml', and 'config_machines.xml' files in the cime/config/cesm/machines directory, following the CESM2.1.4. I could successfully create a new case and build it, but encountered an error when running './case.submit'.

Here are the error message:

ERROR: Command: 'qsub -q main -l walltime=4:00:00 -A UBUB0005 -v ARGS_FOR_SCRIPT='--resubmit' .case.run' failed with error 'b'qsub: Illegal attribute or resource value select.mpiprocs'' from dir '/glade/work/wangly/cesm2.0.1/cime/scripts/case002'

Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 16.25.53.png
 

jedwards

CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
The official release that you should use is CESM2.1.5
The config_batch.xml from the 2.1 series is not compatible with 2.0.1 - if you insist on porting 2.0.1 you will need to port cime from
python 2 to python 3. The particular issue you are hitting is that the number of tasks is computed as a real value but it should be an
integer. When you solve that one you are going to find several others, I highly encourage you to use cesm2.1.5 instead.
 

wangly

Linying Wang
New Member
Thank you. We prefer to use 2.0.1 because we have modified many scripts. Do you have any suggestions for porting 2.0.1 directly to Derecho, rather than following 2.1? Alternatively, if the new machine no longer supports 2.0, would it be better to transfer our modifications to the new version of CESM?
 

jedwards

CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
Yes, I strongly suggest transferring your modifications to 2.1.5 or perhaps even our 2.3 beta series if this is something that you want in cesm3.
I would be happy to discuss with you if you want to meet next week and tell me more about what you are doing.
 

wangly

Linying Wang
New Member
Thanks for your suggestion. It would be great to discuss this further with you. I am available next week and would like to meet at your convenience.
 
Top