Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

CESM1.2.1 and earlier- Temperature tendency output TTEND_TOT / PTTEND / DTCORE

S

swahl@geomar_de

Member
Dear JerryI assume that this bug is already present in CESM 1.0.x (specifically CESM 1.0.2)? I'm asking this as we are currently extending an older CESM 1.0.2 run where we want to add DTCORE and PTTEND as additional output. At least the relevant code part (tphysac.F90 tphyspc.F90) in CESM 1.0.2 look similar to CESM 1.2.0 to me.Thanks for you helpSebastian
 
O

olson

Member
  Correct.  DTCORE was added to the code more than 7 years ago and its original form is the same as today.  So it is likely in the same form in all the CESM releases.  Technically it may not be a bug, but a "feature" as the original developermay have wanted to express the change in dry static energy by the dynamics as a temperature change.  However, I agree it isnot a feature of much use to us.  :)
 
O

olson

Member
  Correct.  DTCORE was added to the code more than 7 years ago and its original form is the same as today.  So it is likely in the same form in all the CESM releases.  Technically it may not be a bug, but a "feature" as the original developermay have wanted to express the change in dry static energy by the dynamics as a temperature change.  However, I agree it isnot a feature of much use to us.  :)
 
O

olson

Member
  Correct.  DTCORE was added to the code more than 7 years ago and its original form is the same as today.  So it is likely in the same form in all the CESM releases.  Technically it may not be a bug, but a "feature" as the original developermay have wanted to express the change in dry static energy by the dynamics as a temperature change.  However, I agree it isnot a feature of much use to us.  :)
 
O

olson

Member
  Correct.  DTCORE was added to the code more than 7 years ago and its original form is the same as today.  So it is likely in the same form in all the CESM releases.  Technically it may not be a bug, but a "feature" as the original developermay have wanted to express the change in dry static energy by the dynamics as a temperature change.  However, I agree it isnot a feature of much use to us.  :)
 
O

olson

Member
  Correct.  DTCORE was added to the code more than 7 years ago and its original form is the same as today.  So it is likely in the same form in all the CESM releases.  Technically it may not be a bug, but a "feature" as the original developermay have wanted to express the change in dry static energy by the dynamics as a temperature change.  However, I agree it isnot a feature of much use to us.  :)
 
O

olson

Member
  Correct.  DTCORE was added to the code more than 7 years ago and its original form is the same as today.  So it is likely in the same form in all the CESM releases.  Technically it may not be a bug, but a "feature" as the original developermay have wanted to express the change in dry static energy by the dynamics as a temperature change.  However, I agree it isnot a feature of much use to us.  :)
 
O

olson

Member
  Correct.  DTCORE was added to the code more than 7 years ago and its original form is the same as today.  So it is likely in the same form in all the CESM releases.  Technically it may not be a bug, but a "feature" as the original developermay have wanted to express the change in dry static energy by the dynamics as a temperature change.  However, I agree it isnot a feature of much use to us.  :)
 
O

olson

Member
  Correct.  DTCORE was added to the code more than 7 years ago and its original form is the same as today.  So it is likely in the same form in all the CESM releases.  Technically it may not be a bug, but a "feature" as the original developermay have wanted to express the change in dry static energy by the dynamics as a temperature change.  However, I agree it isnot a feature of much use to us.  :)
 
C

cacraig

Cheryl Craig
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
This fix is in the 1.2.2 release(upcoming June 1, 2014).  It has also been put into the CAM development trunk (at cam5_3_32).  It was decided to not put this bug fix into the cesm1.0.x series, but the user can apply the changes detailed above to fix the bug if they wish.
 
C

cacraig

Cheryl Craig
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
This fix is in the 1.2.2 release(upcoming June 1, 2014).  It has also been put into the CAM development trunk (at cam5_3_32).  It was decided to not put this bug fix into the cesm1.0.x series, but the user can apply the changes detailed above to fix the bug if they wish.
 
C

cacraig

Cheryl Craig
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
This fix is in the 1.2.2 release(upcoming June 1, 2014).  It has also been put into the CAM development trunk (at cam5_3_32).  It was decided to not put this bug fix into the cesm1.0.x series, but the user can apply the changes detailed above to fix the bug if they wish.
 
C

cacraig

Cheryl Craig
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
This fix is in the 1.2.2 release(upcoming June 1, 2014).  It has also been put into the CAM development trunk (at cam5_3_32).  It was decided to not put this bug fix into the cesm1.0.x series, but the user can apply the changes detailed above to fix the bug if they wish.
 
C

cacraig

Cheryl Craig
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
This fix is in the 1.2.2 release(upcoming June 1, 2014).  It has also been put into the CAM development trunk (at cam5_3_32).  It was decided to not put this bug fix into the cesm1.0.x series, but the user can apply the changes detailed above to fix the bug if they wish.
 
C

cacraig

Cheryl Craig
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
This fix is in the 1.2.2 release(upcoming June 1, 2014).  It has also been put into the CAM development trunk (at cam5_3_32).  It was decided to not put this bug fix into the cesm1.0.x series, but the user can apply the changes detailed above to fix the bug if they wish.
 
C

cacraig

Cheryl Craig
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
This fix is in the 1.2.2 release(upcoming June 1, 2014).  It has also been put into the CAM development trunk (at cam5_3_32).  It was decided to not put this bug fix into the cesm1.0.x series, but the user can apply the changes detailed above to fix the bug if they wish.
 
C

cacraig

Cheryl Craig
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
This fix is in the 1.2.2 release(upcoming June 1, 2014).  It has also been put into the CAM development trunk (at cam5_3_32).  It was decided to not put this bug fix into the cesm1.0.x series, but the user can apply the changes detailed above to fix the bug if they wish.
 
L

little trouble maker

New Member
Hi all,

I wang to do sensitivity experiments by modifying latent heating using the CAM4 in CEMS1.2.0, that is, I want to modify DTCOND, but I don't know which subroutine in physpkg.f90 should be modified specifically.Are the following four sections modified: convect_shallow_tend, convect_deep_tend, Stratiform_tend, and macrop_tend?Or should other subroutines be modified?

Thanks very much!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top