Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

FCnudged and FHIST AODSVIS differences

nuvolet

Toni Viudez
Member
Greetings,

Assuming that using compset FCnudged and FHIST, for the atmosphere, they differ by:

FCnudged: CAM cam6 physics:CAM-Chem troposphere/stratosphere chemistry with simplified VBS-SOA

FHIST: CAM cam6 physics

I was wondering if that explains why both compsets have different AODVIS in the history files.

Thanks in advance
 

nuvolet

Toni Viudez
Member
Here there is an example plot for the AODVISdn differences for AODVISdn for FCnudged and FHIST compsets using MERRA2 re-analisys.

AODVISdn_FCnudged-FHIST.png
 

brianpm

Member
Maybe I'm not quite understanding your question, but I wouldn't expect AODVIS to be the same between these configurations.

- As you noted, the chemistry is different between CAM-Chem and CAM6, which will lead to different aerosol fields, I think.
- I'm not sure whether the initial condition is the same between these compsets, but if not, that would also result in different weather
- Depending on how far into the simulation you are looking, the weather will be quite different between the one nudged to MERRA and the free-running FHIST.

Just to be clear about it: "FHIST" is a land-atmosphere configuration that uses observed SST and sea-ice as lower boundary conditions, and uses observed GHG concentrations and aerosol emissions. The weather is not expected to follow the observed weather. The nudged configuration is continuously relaxed to the specified data set (here MERRA), so the atmospheric state (the weather) is much more strongly constrained.

Hope that helps. Please feel free to follow up if not.
 

nuvolet

Toni Viudez
Member
Maybe I'm not quite understanding your question, but I wouldn't expect AODVIS to be the same between these configurations.

- As you noted, the chemistry is different between CAM-Chem and CAM6, which will lead to different aerosol fields, I think.
- I'm not sure whether the initial condition is the same between these compsets, but if not, that would also result in different weather
- Depending on how far into the simulation you are looking, the weather will be quite different between the one nudged to MERRA and the free-running FHIST.

Just to be clear about it: "FHIST" is a land-atmosphere configuration that uses observed SST and sea-ice as lower boundary conditions, and uses observed GHG concentrations and aerosol emissions. The weather is not expected to follow the observed weather. The nudged configuration is continuously relaxed to the specified data set (here MERRA), so the atmospheric state (the weather) is much more strongly constrained.

Hope that helps. Please feel free to follow up if not.
Hi Brian,

Both cases have same initial conditions:

Code:
  ./create_newcase --case FCnudged_control --compset FCnudged --res f09_f09_mg17  --run-unsupported       
  ./case.setup
  ./xmlchange RUN_STARTDATE=2008-01-01,STOP_OPTION=ndays,STOP_N=2,DOUT_S=FALSE

and


Code:
  ./create_newcase --case FHIST_control --compset FHIST --res f09_f09_mg17  --run-unsupported       
  ./case.setup
  ./xmlchange RUN_STARTDATE=2008-01-01,STOP_OPTION=ndays,STOP_N=2,DOUT_S=FALSE


While the nudging_nl is described for both cases in user_nl_cam file as:

Code:
&nudging_nl
nudge_model            = .true.
model_times_per_day    = 48
nudge_times_per_day    = 8
nudge_timescale_opt    = 1       
nudge_path             = '/glade/p/cesmdata/cseg/inputdata/atm/cam/met/nudging/MERRA2_fv09_32L/'
nudge_file_template    = '%y/MERRA2_fv09.cam2.i.%y-%m-%d-%s.nc'
nudge_force_opt        = 0
nudge_pscoef           = 0.00
nudge_psprof           = 0
nudge_qcoef            = 0.25
nudge_qprof            = 1
nudge_tcoef            = 0.25
nudge_tprof            = 1
nudge_ucoef            = 0.25
nudge_uprof            = 1
nudge_vcoef            = 0.25
nudge_vprof            = 1
/

Both runs, FCnudged and FHIST, are nudged by the MERRA re-analisys.

Thanks
 

brianpm

Member
If you have confirmed that your FHIST run is being nudged correctly, then I think you are right that the difference is the chemistry.
 

brianpm

Member
Well... I guess you should also confirm that everything else is the same too... like all the emissions files, the atmospheric composition, the ozone file, the land setup.
 
Top