FHIST, which has been in operation since 2010, produces smaller results

[wrunyu]

Dear all，
I'm running CESM 2.1.3 FHIST mode, which I want to run from 2010, and downloaded the 2010 related nc file from the official website.
. /xmlchange RUN_STARTDATE=2010-01-01
. /xmlchange RUN_REFDATE=2010-01-01
I have modified all of the above.
I also add use_init_interp = .true. in user_nl_clm, otherwise it will report an error, my research area is the Tibetan Plateau, the data extracted in cam bc_a1_SRF and bc_a4_SRF value is particularly small, for the minus 14th power of 10, the normal value should be in the minus 10th power or minus 9th power of 10, please help me analyze the reason: what data or model should I add?Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Wang

 

[erik]

Wang

We need a better description of exactly what the problem is you are running into, and how you've determined the values are too small. So details of the case, as well as what data you are comparing to.

Since this seems to be particular to CAM, I'm moving it to the CAM forum.

 

[wrunyu]

Wang

We need a better description of exactly what the problem is you are running into, and how you've determined the values are too small. So details of the case, as well as what data you are comparing to.

Since this seems to be particular to CAM, I'm moving it to the CAM forum.

I have solved the problem, thank you very much for your reply!

 

[wbr2023]

I have solved the problem, thank you very much for your reply!

May I know what the problem is. I recently get a similar problem. Thanks!