Sorry for the mistake. Please focus on this message.I got the soil layer thickness (deltazi) from the clm5 user's guide (see the third row from the attached Fig). And, I tried to convert a to b by the following method:
SOILLIQ (kg/m^2)/(1000*deltazi) = H2OSOI (m^3/m^3).
However, the results seem incorrect.
Dear Oleson,H2OSOI includes SOILICE
Dear oleson,If there is no ice then I would think that approach should work. I spot-checked a couple of gridcells from a recent run I had and that equation worked fine. I guess I would suggest producing some global maps of the difference at each soil layer and seeing if you can find some spatial pattern in the differences that would explain the differences.
Problem has been solved. The correct equation should be (SOILLIQ/1000+SOILICE/920)/deltazi = H2OSOI. Thanks everyone.Dear oleson,
Thanks for your reply. Acoording to you reply, I think H2OSOI should equal to SOILLIQ plus SOILICE in every month, which is is mathematically rigorous?
I tried to convert SOILLIQ+SOILICE (kg/m^2) to H2OSOI (m^3/m^3) by the following method:
(SOILLIQ+SOILICE)/(1000*deltazi) = H2OSOI
where deltazi=
0.02,0.04,0.06,0.08,0.12,0.16,0.2,0.24,0.28,0.32,0.36,0.4,0.44,0.54,0.64,0.74,0.84,0.94,1.04,1.14
I found this method works fine in Jun-Sep, but not very well (~7% bias relative to the reference) in other months when there are many SOILICE over land. It is strange because I think the equation should be be mathematically rigorous. Do you have any suggestions?
Best,
Kaiwen