Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

MARBL ERROR: bounding bracket for pH solution not found

Jay Zhu

Member
Hi all,

I am running a CESM2.1.3 cases with BSSP585cmip6_BPRP. The program runs normally until June 2090 when an ERROR occurs, which shows a 'MARBL ERROR: bounding bracket for pH solution not found' in cesm log file. Can someone tell me about this error and how to fix it?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Jay
截屏2023-10-12 20.23.38.png
 

mlevy

Michael Levy
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
This is a very common error, and is typically indicative of a CFL violation -- you need to take a smaller time step. Notice in your error message that temperature is being reported as -42.9 degrees; in future simulations, sea ice melts off the coast of Greenland exposing ocean in portions of the gx1v7 with very small grid cells. See this post for slightly more detail, but increasing dt_count will force POP to take smaller time steps and hopefully prevent this instability from cropping up.
 

Jay Zhu

Member
This is a very common error, and is typically indicative of a CFL violation -- you need to take a smaller time step. Notice in your error message that temperature is being reported as -42.9 degrees; in future simulations, sea ice melts off the coast of Greenland exposing ocean in portions of the gx1v7 with very small grid cells. See this post for slightly more detail, but increasing dt_count will force POP to take smaller time steps and hopefully prevent this instability from cropping up.
Thank you for your answer. I would like to know whether the change of dt_count will bias the previous results?
 

mlevy

Michael Levy
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
It shouldn't -- as long as you restart from a period where the smaller dt_count value was stable, changing to a bigger value should not drastically change the simulation (we consider it answer-changing but not climate-changing).
 
Top