Super low roof emissivity in the new surface data

Status
Not open for further replies.

Yuan Sun

Yuan Sun
Active Member
Hi all,

I am running CTSM5.2 and found that roof emissivity for TBD in somewhere (e.g., UK ) is 0.04. It seems to be rather small representing TBD emissivity.

I uploaded two plots. The UK one is generated by the mksurfdata_esmf in CTSM5.2.005. The global one is from inputdata/lnd/clm2/surfdata_esmf/ctsm5.2.0/surfdata_0.9x1.25_hist_1850_78pfts_c240216.nc.

How to interpret it? Thanks for any comments.

Best,
Yuan
 

Attachments

  • 截屏2024-05-31 11.14.53.png
    截屏2024-05-31 11.14.53.png
    72.6 KB · Views: 4
  • 截屏2024-05-31 11.17.13.png
    截屏2024-05-31 11.17.13.png
    73.6 KB · Views: 4

Yuan Sun

Yuan Sun
Active Member
There are three grids having TBD fraction and 0.04 roof emissivity for TBD in the global surface dataset.
[lsmlat, lsmlon]: [138, 40], [139, 40], [150, 0] (london, UK)

HD and MD also meet the same issues where roof emissivity is 0.04.
 

oleson

Keith Oleson
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
The Jackson et al. dataset specifies that the majority of roofs in that region are made out of galvanized steel (zinc coated steel) which has an emissivity of 0.04 according to the literature. New datasets being developed by Yifan Cheng/Lei Zhao indicate that the assumed construction is inaccurate and/or these emissivity values are likely too low even for metal roofs.
 

Yuan Sun

Yuan Sun
Active Member
The Jackson et al. dataset specifies that the majority of roofs in that region are made out of galvanized steel (zinc coated steel) which has an emissivity of 0.04 according to the literature. New datasets being developed by Yifan Cheng/Lei Zhao indicate that the assumed construction is inaccurate and/or these emissivity values are likely too low even for metal roofs.
Hi Keith,

Thanks for your explanation. I got it.

Best,
Yuan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top