Scheduled Downtime
On Tuesday 24 October 2023 @ 5pm MT the forums will be in read only mode in preparation for the downtime. On Wednesday 25 October 2023 @ 5am MT, this website will be down for maintenance and expected to return online later in the morning.
Normal Operations
The forums are back online with normal operations. If you notice any issues or errors related to the forums, please reach out to help@ucar.edu

POP-ECT Failure with CESM2.1.3

C

cemac-ccs

Chris Symonds
New Member
Hi all

I am double checking a port of CESM 2.1.3 on Archer2 and the POP-ECT test is failing, even though the UF-ECT succeeds with no issue. The output on the verification website is

CESM Version Tested: CESM 2.1.3
Metadata retrieved from: popcase.cesm_213.000.pop.h.0001-12.nc

**********Run 1 (file=/cesmwebverify/ensembles/20220517041807840748/popcase.cesm_213.000.pop.h.0001-12.nc):
UVEL: 86.62%
VVEL: 88.04%
TEMP: 76.07%
SALT: 68.24%
SSH: 41.66%
**********5 of 5 variables failed, resulting in an overall FAIL**********

Testing complete.
Click to expand...

I am running with the following modules loaded, and the architecture is AMD EPYC (mentioned because a thread from last April indicated that it may be an issue):

1) gcc/10.2.0 4) libfabric/1.11.0.4.71 7) xpmem/2.2.40-7.0.1.0_2.7__g1d7a24d.shasta 10) bolt/0.7 13) PrgEnv-gnu/8.0.0 16) cray-parallel-netcdf/1.12.1.3
2) craype/2.7.6 5) craype-network-ofi 8) cray-mpich/8.1.4 11) epcc-setup-env 14) cray-hdf5-parallel/1.12.0.3
3) craype-x86-rome 6) perftools-base/21.02.0 9) cray-libsci/21.04.1.1 12) load-epcc-module 15) cray-netcdf-hdf5parallel/4.7.4.3
Click to expand...

Runs are completing fine and seemingly correctly (F2000, ETEST and B1850 runs have been verified) and the scripts_regression_test only runs into a very small issue with the exit code being returned incorrectly by slurm, so I don't know why this should be failing.

The machine configuration has been included in the maint-5.6 branch of cime as `archer2`so I will not include it here.

There is a similar thread by user Mikasa that has been posted recently, however I did not want to hijack their support request so I have made my own. The percentages seem to be in the same regions as Mikasa observed however.

Looking forward to your reply, as I can't see any indication of the source of the problem here
 
C

cemac-ccs

Chris Symonds
New Member
Just a quick note to say that like with user Mikasa in the other thread linked to in my earlier post, the POP-ECT test now runs successfully for me when I upload the previously used file, giving the output

Code: 
CESM Version Tested: CESM 2.1.3
Metadata retrieved from: popcase.cesm_213.000.pop.h.0001-12.nc

**********Run 1 (file=/cesmwebverify/ensembles/20220623055611994872/popcase.cesm_213.000.pop.h.0001-12.nc):
                UVEL: 99.46%
                VVEL: 99.40%
                TEMP: 99.36%
                SALT: 99.42%
                 SSH: 99.35%
**********0 of 5 variables failed, resulting in an overall PASS**********
 
Testing complete.

Thanks for looking into this
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top