A general question about selecting the right compset to study permafrost

Status
Not open for further replies.

MS_CLM

New Member
I would like to (historical) model and (future) project responses of the Canadian permafrost thermal state to climate change on the coupled energy-water-carbon fluxes using the CLM model. For this purpose, which component set do you recommend to use?

I have compiled the CLM model (support level: Defined) with I2000Clm50Cn at ~50km grid resolution (f05_g17, lnd:0.47x0.63); this compset (which, includes land, land-ice, carbon model, river-runoff etc.,) seems to be a right choose for my research.

Any recommendations please?
 

oleson

Keith Oleson
CSEG and Liaisons
Staff member
I would recommend reading this paper that discusses improvements in CLM5BGC with regard to permafrost:

Lawrence, D.M. R.A. Fisher, C.D. Koven, K.W. Oleson, S.C. Swenson, G. Bonan, N. Collier, B. Ghimire, L. van Kampenhout, D. Kennedy, E. Kluzek, P.J. Lawrence, F. Li, H. Li, D. Lombardozzi, W.J. Riley, W.J. Sacks, M. Shi, M. Vertenstein, W.R. Wieder,, C. Xu, A.A. Ali, A.M. Badger, G. Bisht, M. van den Broeke, M.A. Brunke, S.P. Burns,, J. Buzan, M. Clark, A. Craig, K. Dahlin, B. Drewniak, J.B. Fisher, M. Flanner, A.M. Fox, P. Gentine, F.Hoffman, G. Keppel-Aleks, R., Knox, S. Kumar, J. Lenaerts, L.R. Leung, W.H. Lipscomb, Y. Lu, A., Pandey, J.D. Pelletier, J. Perket,, J.T. Randerson, D.M. Ricciuto, B.M. Sanderson, A. Slater, Z.M. Subin, J. Tang, R.Q. Thomas, M. Val Martin, and X. Zeng, 2019: The Community Land Model version 5: Description of new features, benchmarking, and impact of forcing uncertainty, JAMES, 11, doi:10.1029/2018MS001583.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top