huili7@illinois_edu
Member
Hi Zedong,Thanks for the suggestions! Hui
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
ERROR: remap transport: bad departure points
- Thread starter zdliu
- Start date
huili7@illinois_edu
Member
Hi Zedong,Thanks for the suggestions! Hui
huili7@illinois_edu
Member
Hi Zedong,Thanks for the suggestions! Hui
huili7@illinois_edu
Member
Hi Zedong,Thanks for the suggestions! Hui
huili7@illinois_edu
Member
Hi Zedong,Thanks for the suggestions! Hui
jjakacki@iopan_gda_pl
Member
Hello Dears,I have just got the same error in ice model. I was aware how to solve it, but i would like to wake this topic up. The main reason is that when the error appeared in my simulation, I have not seen any possibility for having ice in this simulation (surface temperature is bigger then 4 Celsius degrees). But i got this error from ice model.I work with my own configuration - it is not typical provided by developers. It is based on G or H compset, thus i have only ice and ocean components active. Other models provide only data (prepared ouside of the model). I did a lot of modifications for having working the cesm as high resolution model for coastal areas. The horizontal resolution is ~100 meters, vertical smallest levels have 30 cm thickness. I will be very happy that somebody will take a look here and try to help/eplain me what happen.With best regards,Jaromir
jjakacki@iopan_gda_pl
Member
Hello Dears,I have just got the same error in ice model. I was aware how to solve it, but i would like to wake this topic up. The main reason is that when the error appeared in my simulation, I have not seen any possibility for having ice in this simulation (surface temperature is bigger then 4 Celsius degrees). But i got this error from ice model.I work with my own configuration - it is not typical provided by developers. It is based on G or H compset, thus i have only ice and ocean components active. Other models provide only data (prepared ouside of the model). I did a lot of modifications for having working the cesm as high resolution model for coastal areas. The horizontal resolution is ~100 meters, vertical smallest levels have 30 cm thickness. I will be very happy that somebody will take a look here and try to help/eplain me what happen.With best regards,Jaromir
jjakacki@iopan_gda_pl
Member
Hello Dears,I have just got the same error in ice model. I was aware how to solve it, but i would like to wake this topic up. The main reason is that when the error appeared in my simulation, I have not seen any possibility for having ice in this simulation (surface temperature is bigger then 4 Celsius degrees). But i got this error from ice model.I work with my own configuration - it is not typical provided by developers. It is based on G or H compset, thus i have only ice and ocean components active. Other models provide only data (prepared ouside of the model). I did a lot of modifications for having working the cesm as high resolution model for coastal areas. The horizontal resolution is ~100 meters, vertical smallest levels have 30 cm thickness. I will be very happy that somebody will take a look here and try to help/eplain me what happen.With best regards,Jaromir
jjakacki@iopan_gda_pl
Member
Hello Dears,I have just got the same error in ice model. I was aware how to solve it, but i would like to wake this topic up. The main reason is that when the error appeared in my simulation, I have not seen any possibility for having ice in this simulation (surface temperature is bigger then 4 Celsius degrees). But i got this error from ice model.I work with my own configuration - it is not typical provided by developers. It is based on G or H compset, thus i have only ice and ocean components active. Other models provide only data (prepared ouside of the model). I did a lot of modifications for having working the cesm as high resolution model for coastal areas. The horizontal resolution is ~100 meters, vertical smallest levels have 30 cm thickness. I will be very happy that somebody will take a look here and try to help/eplain me what happen.With best regards,Jaromir
jjakacki@iopan_gda_pl
Member
Hello Dears,I have just got the same error in ice model. I was aware how to solve it, but i would like to wake this topic up. The main reason is that when the error appeared in my simulation, I have not seen any possibility for having ice in this simulation (surface temperature is bigger then 4 Celsius degrees). But i got this error from ice model.I work with my own configuration - it is not typical provided by developers. It is based on G or H compset, thus i have only ice and ocean components active. Other models provide only data (prepared ouside of the model). I did a lot of modifications for having working the cesm as high resolution model for coastal areas. The horizontal resolution is ~100 meters, vertical smallest levels have 30 cm thickness. I will be very happy that somebody will take a look here and try to help/eplain me what happen.With best regards,Jaromir
jjakacki@iopan_gda_pl
Member
Hello Dears,I have just got the same error in ice model. I was aware how to solve it, but i would like to wake this topic up. The main reason is that when the error appeared in my simulation, I have not seen any possibility for having ice in this simulation (surface temperature is bigger then 4 Celsius degrees). But i got this error from ice model.I work with my own configuration - it is not typical provided by developers. It is based on G or H compset, thus i have only ice and ocean components active. Other models provide only data (prepared ouside of the model). I did a lot of modifications for having working the cesm as high resolution model for coastal areas. The horizontal resolution is ~100 meters, vertical smallest levels have 30 cm thickness. I will be very happy that somebody will take a look here and try to help/eplain me what happen.With best regards,Jaromir
jjakacki@iopan_gda_pl
Member
Hello Dears,I have just got the same error in ice model. I was aware how to solve it, but i would like to wake this topic up. The main reason is that when the error appeared in my simulation, I have not seen any possibility for having ice in this simulation (surface temperature is bigger then 4 Celsius degrees). But i got this error from ice model.I work with my own configuration - it is not typical provided by developers. It is based on G or H compset, thus i have only ice and ocean components active. Other models provide only data (prepared ouside of the model). I did a lot of modifications for having working the cesm as high resolution model for coastal areas. The horizontal resolution is ~100 meters, vertical smallest levels have 30 cm thickness. I will be very happy that somebody will take a look here and try to help/eplain me what happen.With best regards,Jaromir
jjakacki@iopan_gda_pl
Member
Hello Dears,I have just got the same error in ice model. I was aware how to solve it, but i would like to wake this topic up. The main reason is that when the error appeared in my simulation, I have not seen any possibility for having ice in this simulation (surface temperature is bigger then 4 Celsius degrees). But i got this error from ice model.I work with my own configuration - it is not typical provided by developers. It is based on G or H compset, thus i have only ice and ocean components active. Other models provide only data (prepared ouside of the model). I did a lot of modifications for having working the cesm as high resolution model for coastal areas. The horizontal resolution is ~100 meters, vertical smallest levels have 30 cm thickness. I will be very happy that somebody will take a look here and try to help/eplain me what happen.With best regards,Jaromir
This is essentially a CFL violation in the CICE model. You would need to reduce the timestep. In the CESM, the CICE timestep is tied to the coupling interval with the atmosphere. Have a look at ATM_NCPL and ICE_NCPL. Try doubling ATM_NCPL and this should help. For high resolution (0.1-degree) you can use xndt_dyn or ndtd depending on the version of the code. This allows you to take multiple dynamic timesteps per thermodynamic timestep.Dave
This is essentially a CFL violation in the CICE model. You would need to reduce the timestep. In the CESM, the CICE timestep is tied to the coupling interval with the atmosphere. Have a look at ATM_NCPL and ICE_NCPL. Try doubling ATM_NCPL and this should help. For high resolution (0.1-degree) you can use xndt_dyn or ndtd depending on the version of the code. This allows you to take multiple dynamic timesteps per thermodynamic timestep.Dave
This is essentially a CFL violation in the CICE model. You would need to reduce the timestep. In the CESM, the CICE timestep is tied to the coupling interval with the atmosphere. Have a look at ATM_NCPL and ICE_NCPL. Try doubling ATM_NCPL and this should help. For high resolution (0.1-degree) you can use xndt_dyn or ndtd depending on the version of the code. This allows you to take multiple dynamic timesteps per thermodynamic timestep.Dave
This is essentially a CFL violation in the CICE model. You would need to reduce the timestep. In the CESM, the CICE timestep is tied to the coupling interval with the atmosphere. Have a look at ATM_NCPL and ICE_NCPL. Try doubling ATM_NCPL and this should help. For high resolution (0.1-degree) you can use xndt_dyn or ndtd depending on the version of the code. This allows you to take multiple dynamic timesteps per thermodynamic timestep.Dave
This is essentially a CFL violation in the CICE model. You would need to reduce the timestep. In the CESM, the CICE timestep is tied to the coupling interval with the atmosphere. Have a look at ATM_NCPL and ICE_NCPL. Try doubling ATM_NCPL and this should help. For high resolution (0.1-degree) you can use xndt_dyn or ndtd depending on the version of the code. This allows you to take multiple dynamic timesteps per thermodynamic timestep.Dave
This is essentially a CFL violation in the CICE model. You would need to reduce the timestep. In the CESM, the CICE timestep is tied to the coupling interval with the atmosphere. Have a look at ATM_NCPL and ICE_NCPL. Try doubling ATM_NCPL and this should help. For high resolution (0.1-degree) you can use xndt_dyn or ndtd depending on the version of the code. This allows you to take multiple dynamic timesteps per thermodynamic timestep.Dave
This is essentially a CFL violation in the CICE model. You would need to reduce the timestep. In the CESM, the CICE timestep is tied to the coupling interval with the atmosphere. Have a look at ATM_NCPL and ICE_NCPL. Try doubling ATM_NCPL and this should help. For high resolution (0.1-degree) you can use xndt_dyn or ndtd depending on the version of the code. This allows you to take multiple dynamic timesteps per thermodynamic timestep.Dave